tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3760269284779707208.post4890861625165765352..comments2023-11-19T21:44:15.395-05:00Comments on Urban Residue - leftover thoughts from the day: Conflicted Crosswalks: Washington St. and Columbus Dr. in Jersey CityUrban Residuehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16650845463518168416noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3760269284779707208.post-24971677196495549002014-03-26T21:10:33.616-04:002014-03-26T21:10:33.616-04:00Thanks Peter.
As it reads now, 4.D.17.05 and 4D.0...Thanks Peter.<br /><br />As it reads now, 4.D.17.05 and 4D.04 seem contradictory. If there is an intent to allow a degree of professional judgment for things like rural conditions, I think it would help to make that more explicit and provide a little guidance (recommending a R10-15 sign, for example).Urban Residuehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16650845463518168416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3760269284779707208.post-47002975530268449442014-03-25T23:40:52.844-04:002014-03-25T23:40:52.844-04:00My interpretation is what you described in 4D.17.0...My interpretation is what you described in 4D.17.05 and that the green arrow crossing the WALK indication is not allowed. My recollection is that it was explicitly discouraged in past editions, but there are rural conditions where they allow all turning movements from one approach at a time to go, and few pedestrians and so the change was made. pkooncehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13685359921487183869noreply@blogger.com